Congratulations, Egypt!
As I drove across town listening to NPR's special coverage yesterday I couldn't help smiling, repeatedly, as I heard the joy and sense of accomplishment in protesters' voices. I was especially struck by the comments of one observer -- he noted that events in Egypt provided the world with proof that peaceful protest really could effect change. Terror wasn't necessary; therefore, oppressed peoples needn't feel terror is their only option. I hope this is an idea that spreads.
Here's hoping Egyptians are able to successfully make their way through the tricky process of establishing a government that will meet the needs of all its people.
Ruminations upon the dust-laden corners of American history... and their relevance to American society today.
Saturday, February 12, 2011
Wednesday, February 2, 2011
Editing the past?
David Sarasohn of the Oregonian had some very perceptive things to say today about the current understanding of black history and slavery in the United States:
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/david_sarasohn/index.ssf/2011/02/black_history_month_as_we_rewr.html
Well worth a read. Sarasohn holds a Ph.D. in American history from UCLA.
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian/david_sarasohn/index.ssf/2011/02/black_history_month_as_we_rewr.html
Well worth a read. Sarasohn holds a Ph.D. in American history from UCLA.
Saturday, January 22, 2011
Ask not...
Lots of "anniversaries" recently... the 50th anniversary of John F. Kennedy's inaugural speech among them. (And, perhaps just as important in terms of the content if not the emotional charge, Dwight D. Eisenhower's farewell address with his warning about the development of the "military-industrial complex.")
One observation I have made about media recollections of Kennedy's address, made all the more significant by the fact that our current president was born 6 months after that day in early 1961: there continues to be a widespread assumption that we all remember Kennedy's inaugural address. A suggestion, however muted, that we have personally witnessed and yet perhaps not quite responded to his powerful words calling us to service.
Kennedy's words (like Eisenhower's) live on with the immortality of those statements that carry a ring of eternal truth. It is time to recognize, however, that these fifty years--a mere blink in our historical memory--nonetheless bring with them not one, but at least two generations of adult Americans, coming to maturity (?) in a post-Kennedy era. To suggest that we bring with us a personal link to Kennedy is to deny not only the changing face of America, but to bind ourselves to the emotions of a particular time and place without offering ourselves the opportunity to evaluate in historical context.
Kennedy's address--and his presidency--have lessons to offer us that travel lightyears beyond the emotions of the time. Personal connection is powerful, and we can continue to be moved personally even by events and statements we did not witness. It is time, however, to move beyond the personal and into the reality of a world where intelligent, honest, earnest people can begin to assess with the detachment of historical rather than living memory.
We need the witnesses. When the witnesses are finally gone--and I pray that will not be the case for many years to come--we need their memories, written, recorded and otherwise preserved. We also, however, need to move on, to recognize that we are no longer a nation of the 1960s, even as we continue to be a nation deeply impacted by the history of the 1960s. These are two different things.
One observation I have made about media recollections of Kennedy's address, made all the more significant by the fact that our current president was born 6 months after that day in early 1961: there continues to be a widespread assumption that we all remember Kennedy's inaugural address. A suggestion, however muted, that we have personally witnessed and yet perhaps not quite responded to his powerful words calling us to service.
Kennedy's words (like Eisenhower's) live on with the immortality of those statements that carry a ring of eternal truth. It is time to recognize, however, that these fifty years--a mere blink in our historical memory--nonetheless bring with them not one, but at least two generations of adult Americans, coming to maturity (?) in a post-Kennedy era. To suggest that we bring with us a personal link to Kennedy is to deny not only the changing face of America, but to bind ourselves to the emotions of a particular time and place without offering ourselves the opportunity to evaluate in historical context.
Kennedy's address--and his presidency--have lessons to offer us that travel lightyears beyond the emotions of the time. Personal connection is powerful, and we can continue to be moved personally even by events and statements we did not witness. It is time, however, to move beyond the personal and into the reality of a world where intelligent, honest, earnest people can begin to assess with the detachment of historical rather than living memory.
We need the witnesses. When the witnesses are finally gone--and I pray that will not be the case for many years to come--we need their memories, written, recorded and otherwise preserved. We also, however, need to move on, to recognize that we are no longer a nation of the 1960s, even as we continue to be a nation deeply impacted by the history of the 1960s. These are two different things.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Ads of yore #6
Umm....

This one comes to us from 1955. Eisenhower's in the White House... Lucy's on the television... Tennessee Ernie Williams is singing "Sixteen Tons" on the radio... and this "jewel-like beauty sparkles like a gem in any bath."
From http://christmasyuleblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/vintage-christmas-ads-pt-18-borg-1955.html; this blogger provides a cite for the original link.
This one comes to us from 1955. Eisenhower's in the White House... Lucy's on the television... Tennessee Ernie Williams is singing "Sixteen Tons" on the radio... and this "jewel-like beauty sparkles like a gem in any bath."
From http://christmasyuleblog.blogspot.com/2009/04/vintage-christmas-ads-pt-18-borg-1955.html; this blogger provides a cite for the original link.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Ads of yore #5
I have noticed this on various blogs and will post the link I actually used below. Love it. Well, don't love it at all insofar as a certain local Mr. Gifford values his life more than to ever attempt giving one of these for Christmas, but it's an interesting little side trip down memory lane in the history of American gender stereotypes...

Ah, 1960. A very good year for Massachusetts senators, anyway.
Image from: http://vintage13.wordpress.com/page/7/

Ah, 1960. A very good year for Massachusetts senators, anyway.
Image from: http://vintage13.wordpress.com/page/7/
Tuesday, December 21, 2010
Ads of yore #4
For everyone who remembers flapping those instant photographs to "help" the image emerge...

This image comes to us from the polyester-tinged days of 1978 and is part of a great collection posted by a blogger at: http://christmasyuleblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/vintage-christmas-ads-pt-13-celebrity.html.
This image comes to us from the polyester-tinged days of 1978 and is part of a great collection posted by a blogger at: http://christmasyuleblog.blogspot.com/2008/12/vintage-christmas-ads-pt-13-celebrity.html.
Monday, December 20, 2010
Ads of yore #3
I love Christmas lights, and it turns out people (rich people, at least) have been loving electric lights longer than one might have suspected... here's a nice little number from General Electric, vintage 1904:

I include this under the rubric of ads we would not see today given our contemporary concerns about safety. I'm thinking I would not let my four-year-old anywhere near a string of wiring manufactured in 1904, even if it was brand-new at the time. A "festoon" of eight sockets and ten "lamps" cost $5.00. For the sake of reference, the average weekly wage in the United States at this time for a worker in the building trades was $17.87 (assuming a full work week averaging 48.3 hours). The average teacher earned $6.30, and the average worker in medical and health services earned $4.92. [1]
You can see this image, other advertising brochures and even the text of these early ads on the following page of an excellent Web site called "Old Christmas Tree Lights": http://www.oldchristmastreelights.com/history_2.htm. Enjoy!
[1] Facts and Figures, Income and Prices 1900-1999, US Diplomatic Mission to Germany: http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/his/e_prices1.htm.

I include this under the rubric of ads we would not see today given our contemporary concerns about safety. I'm thinking I would not let my four-year-old anywhere near a string of wiring manufactured in 1904, even if it was brand-new at the time. A "festoon" of eight sockets and ten "lamps" cost $5.00. For the sake of reference, the average weekly wage in the United States at this time for a worker in the building trades was $17.87 (assuming a full work week averaging 48.3 hours). The average teacher earned $6.30, and the average worker in medical and health services earned $4.92. [1]
You can see this image, other advertising brochures and even the text of these early ads on the following page of an excellent Web site called "Old Christmas Tree Lights": http://www.oldchristmastreelights.com/history_2.htm. Enjoy!
[1] Facts and Figures, Income and Prices 1900-1999, US Diplomatic Mission to Germany: http://usa.usembassy.de/etexts/his/e_prices1.htm.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)